Apapun usaha kita untuk menciptakan lingkungan yang selaras, patut kita dukung. Baik solsial ekonomi maupun ekologis.
Selasa, 21 September 2010
Ukhuwwah Islamiyyah
Saya sangat tertarik dengan tulusan Prof. DR. Moh. Mahfud MD dibawah ini, sehingga saya merasa perlu untuk memuatnya dalam blog saya. Lebih dari itu, dengan kualitas manusia seperti Mahfud MD, saya ingin mensosialisasikan beliau sebagai pemimpin Indonesia masa depan. Kita bangsa Indonesia perlu orang seperti ini untuk memimpin bangsa ini.
"Ukhuwwah Islamiyyah" Kompas, Rabu, 15 September 2010 | 04:43 WIB**
*Oleh: Moh Mahfud MD*
Beberapa waktu yang lalu seorang kawan lama yang saat mahasiswa aktif bersama saya di Himpunan Mahasiswa Islam datang kepada saya untuk meminta tolong agar, atas nama ukhuwwah islamiyyah, saya membantu memenangkan seorang calon kepala daerah yang sedang beperkara di Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Itu menjengkelkan saya karena dia datang bukan dengan alasan obyektif agar MK memenangkan orang yang beperkara sesuai dengan hukum dan keadilan, melainkan datang dengan argumen yang menurut saya mengada-ada dan destruktif. Bayangkan, dia meminta saya memenangkan seorang calon kepala daerah dengan alasan calon yang diperjuangkannya adalah orang Islam, sedangkan lawannya bukan Islam. Katanya, demi ukhuwwah islamiyyah saya harus membantu agar yang Islam itu dimenangkan perkaranya oleh MK.
Kepada teman itu saya katakan bahwa dia salah dalam tiga hal. Yakni, salah memahami arti ukhuwwah islamiyyah, salah memahami arti penegakan keadilan dalam Islam, dan salah menilai MK sebagai lembaga yudikatif.
*”Ukhuwwah islamiyyah”*
Kepadanya saya katakan bahwa dirinya salah memahami istilah ukhuwwah islamiyyah karena dia mengartikannya sebagai persaudaraan antar sesama orang-orang Islam. Padahal, dari sudut bahasa, istilah ukhuwwah islamiyyah itu adalah persaudaraan yang Islami atau persaudaraan yang bersifat Islam.
Kalau persaudaraan antar sesama orang Islam, istilahnya tentu ukhuwwah bayn al-muslimien.
Ukuwwah islamiyyah adalah persaudaraan yang islami dalam arti sifat persaudaraan yang bernapas Islam. Dalam pemahaman yang demikian, orang Islam wajib bersikap benar dan baik kepada siapa pun sesuai dengan sifat ”rahmah” Islam; bukan hanya terhadap sesama orang Islam. Dengan ukhuwwah islamiyyah, umat Islam harus tampil dengan inklusif dan kosmopolit. Inklusivisme dalam pluralitas kebangsaan inilah yang dapat menjadi fiqh bagi umat Islam Indonesia.
Dalam persaudaraan antar sesama manusia sifat islami (islamiyyah) itu berarti harus bersikap baik, bersahabat, jujur, menolong, dan menghargai hak orang lain, baik yang Islam maupun bukan Islam. Jadi, ukhuwwah islamiyyah itu adalah persaudaraan yang beradab antar sesama manusia tanpa mengenal eksklusivitas yang terbatas antar sesama orang Islam saja.
*Adil antar manusia *
Saya katakan juga bahwa teman saya itu salah dalam memahami perintah Isla mengenai ”pengadilan yang adil” ketika dia meminta agar, demi ukhuwwah islamiyyah, yang beragama Islam harus dibantu untuk dimenangkan dalam beperkara. Itu salah karena Al Quran dan sunah Rasul memerintahkan agar keadilan itu ditegakkan di antara manusia dan bukan di antara orang-orang Islam saja.
Di dalam Al Quran surat An Nisa’ ayat (58), misalnya, ditegaskan bahwa ”apabila kamu melakukan tahkim (mengadili) di antara manusia (bayn al-naas) maka hakimilah dengan adil”. Sangat eksplisit ayat tersebut memerintahkan, keadilan harus ditegakkan di antara manusia dan bukan hanya di antara dan untuk orang-orang Islam (bayn al muslimien). Jika tahkim hanya menguntungkan dan memihak kelompok tertentu, misalnya karena alasan kesamaan memeluk agama, sejatinya hal tersebut bukanlah keadilan, melainkan kezaliman.
Membedakan secara tegas antara keadilan dan kezaliman berdasar inklusivisme ini penting agar kelangsungan negara terjaga. Ahli filsafat politik Islam ibn Taymiyah mengatakan, ”Akan abadilah eksistensi suatu negara kalau diselenggarakan dengan adil meskipun bukan negara Islam dan akan hancurlah suatu eksistensi negara jika diperintah dengan zalim meskipun bernama negara Islam.”
*Salah menilai MK *
Kepada kawan itu saya nyatakan juga penyesalan karena dia salah menilai MK.
Dengan meminta tolong untuk memenangkan perkara di MK, berarti dia menilai bahwa vonis di MK bisa diatur melalui pendekatan atau kolusi dengan hakim.
Dia ikut terjebak dalam public mindset bahwa di Indonesia semua pengadilan bisa dia beli. Saya katakan bahwa kami di MK berjuang dan menjamin bahwa hal itu tak pernah dan tak boleh terjadi.
Memang kadang kala ada saja orang yang mencoba menitip perkara ke MK, tetapi kepada mereka saya katakan, ”MK akan memberi keadilan, bukan memenuhi pesanan.”
Proses persidangan, pertimbangan, dan penilaian atas fakta hukum dalam setiap perkara juga digelar secara sangat terbuka sehingga tak bisa dibelok-belokkan tanpa diketahui publik dan pihak-pihak yang beperkara. Dari sanalah MK membuat mekanisme yang bertumpu pada prinsip dan adagium internal, ”MK tak bisa mengalahkan pihak yang seharusnya menang dan tak bisa memenangkan pihak yang seharusnya kalah.”
Melalui pemahaman seperti itulah seharusnya ukhuwwah islamiyyah dipergunakan dalam berhukum. Yakni memahami ukhuwwah islamiyyah sebagai persaudaraan yang bersifat islami yang berintikan kejujuran dan keadilan terhadap siapa pun, tidak eksklusif hanya untuk orang-orang Islam. Eksklusivisme itu sendiri sebenarnya paham yang berpijak pada ketidakadilan dan bertentangan dengan fitrah manusia.
*MOH MAHFUD MD*
*Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi*
DR. Maurice Bucaille
P.O. Box 410186, San Francisco, CA 94141-0186
info@islamicbulletin.org
Why I Embraced Islam?
Dr. Maurice Bucaille is a surgeon by profession. He is also a renowned scholar. In order to be able to read Quran in its original text and to study its meaning and purport through direct access to its early and modern commentaries, he devoted himself to the learning of Arabic language at the ripe age of fifty.
Thereafter, he made a beginning by trying to reconcile proven scientific truths with religious axioms. As a result of these studies, he wrote his famous book "QURAN, BIBLE AND SCIENCE" in 1976, which caused a furor in high academic circles - particularly in the Christian world.
After a deeper study of Islam and the Quran, he has authored another book titled, "THE ORIGIN OF MAN". It comprised Quranic explanations of some of the queries raised much earlier than the period when those queries were logically and satisfactorily resolved by scientific experimentation, to be fully in conformity with the explanations provided by Quran about 1500 years before. The Church acknowledged and accepted these researches of Dr. Bucaille to be a valuable contribution to human knowledge and the author became famous all over the world, like Cambridge, and Oxford Universities in U.K. & Yale and Harvard in USA. He was invited to give Extension Lectures in their academic institutions. By dint of his Quranic thought, and by virtue of his unprejudiced and realistic approach to Quranic thought, and by virtue of his unprejudiced and realistic discussion and research work, Dr. Bucaille has converted a number of high ranking scholars to agree with him and to subscribe to his view that the Quran is a Divine Book, not authored by any human being and actually a Book of Revelations from Almighty God to His Last Prophet, Mohammed, Peace Be Upon Him.
M. Bucaille is of the view that his findings in this behalf are a cause of consternation and chagrin to Western scholars because of their earlier exposure to false and fictitious propaganda against Islam and its Prophet (S.A.W.), by the Christian clergy and by biased Western writers and authors. This misguided class of people could not believe that Quran was the only Scripture which had remained sacrosanct and free from all additions, alterations and interpolations and consequently it still retained the purity to guide mankind in all ages, places and in every conceivable crisis.
For over 1400 years it has been the only treasure house of ecclesiastical and cosmic knowledge about the universe and life itself. Mankind has not yet to progress and proceed to a stage where it can fully be au fait with all the pearls and gems of wisdom and truth, garnered in its bosom by this miracle of literacy, excellence and academic purity which could not be matched even in one small sentence by the literary giants of yore, in spite of an open challenge to this effect.
Q: What urged you so forcefully to undertake a study of the Quran and other scriptures, and why?
A: Like all other Frenchmen, I was also initially of the view that Islam was a religion conceived and introduced by a genius and a remarkable man of great intellect, known by the name of Mohammed (S.A.W.). Fifty years ago, by the Grace of God, I became professionally qualified to practice as a surgeon, and used to discuss and compare (views on) Islam and Christianity with my patients who came to consult me (and with my co-professionals). I was told by some of them that my knowledge of Islam and about its discipline was to a great extent misconceived and mistaken. In the beginning I was inclined to doubt them, but now and then some people produced actual and original Quranic Verses in contradiction of my references, and I was compelled to revise my conclusions. And, as a result of this revision and review, I felt that they were right and I was wrong.
I found that those who had been my teachers had a wrong approach to the problem and had imparted incorrect information to me. My knowledge of Islam, until then, had been restricted to Radio and T.V. reviews, articles published in various magazines and reproduced in biased treatise books. But I was perplexed; what should I do? How should I amend my position and rectify my understanding?
Q: When did this happen?
A: After the 8th Vatican Conference but before the birth of a tolerant attitude on the part of European scholars gravitating to unbiased thought, i.e. before 1926, when the cleavage between Muslims and Christian scholars was at its zenith and there was no prospect of a direct dialogue between them.
Q: How did you react to this situation?
A: There was only one road open to me then, that of learning Arabic language so that I could study the Holy Book, Quran, in its original form and try to get at its meaning directly. I devoted the next two years to this task when I had acquired enough knowledge of Arabic (in language and literature) to be able to make a dependable study of the Quran faithfully as well as academically.
Q: And how did this benefit you?
A: I knew then that the Quran was the "Work of Allah" and had not been authored by any human being. I was also convinced that Mohammed (S.A.W.) was a true Prophet of God.
Q: The world is now celebrating the first centenary of Darwin, do you subscribe to Darwinian theory or disagree with it?
A: No Sir, I oppose it vehemently. Darwin's theory is totally based on a misconception and is not at all the outcome of such a scientific research as could prove that there exists the slightest relation between man and the theory of evolution of species as propounded by him. In fact his views are nothing but the misguided and misconceived calculations of a purely materialistic mind. My latest book (Origin of Man) contains a comprehensive "Rebuttal Article" on Darwin and his views.
Q: Are you of the opinion that Darwin was aware of his error?
A: Yes, I think he knew the error he committed. The scholars, who are fond of materialism, have propounded innumerable theories, mostly incorrect, and the fun of it is that they are aware of their fallacies. However, being materialist, they stick to their wrong attitude. In my book I have criticized some of these scholars, several of whom are Nobel Prize winners.
Q: Do you think your writings have had direct repercussion on people outside France?
A: Yes, Recently, only a few days ago, I visited Northern and Western African countries, where I was repeatedly called upon to address innumerable gatherings of educated persons including scholars, on the Origin of Man and about my first book: the Quran, Bible and Science. I was closely cross- examined about my views by some of the most qualified, even hostile, elements. Following this, countless students and scholars contacted and congratulated me. They declared that after listening to me, they had, for the first time, been able to feel convinced of the truth of the Quranic statements about the creation of universe and origin of man. Some of them frankly admitted that my writings and lectures had restored in them a firm certainty of belief and faith and converted them into True Muslims, who actually felt solace and pleasure now in saying their "prayers". They declared that the element of doubt and dilly-dalliance in faith was entirely due to the misconceived theories of some of these so-called Western scholars whose theories had been adopted as gospel truth.
Q: What is the verdict of Science on Man; and why this conflict between Science and Religion on this score?
A: In my book, "Origin of Man", I have endeavored to explain what is dubious and what is proved according to scientific findings. I have also dealt with the theories formerly supported by scholars, but now their very basis is being demolished and proved to be without sound scientific footing. In 1851, Darwin published his first book, "Origin of Species". In it he has pointed out that "All animals can procreate amongst themselves", but he did not take the trouble to demonstrate and prove scientifically his view that the "Genealogy of Man" extends up to monkey.
Q: Then who is responsible for propounding this frivolous theory?
A: The fact is that some other people metamorphosing and without statements digesting his theories, assigned wrong statements to Darwin, which comprised the assumption that "Man has evolved from apes". Nevertheless, it is also true that Darwin did not care to contradict such false notions assigned to him as it was in this connection and on this topic that confrontation occurred between the supporters of Darwin and the Clergy, where both the parties roundly abused and maligned each other. That is why it is now essential that a line of demarcation should always be drawn between the results of scientific investigations and arbitrary views of scholars like Darwin.
Q: By such scientific discourses, debates and discussions even Scriptures, are exposed to scientific test resulting in exposing their errors and pin-pointing their weaknesses. As such, may we inquire if you have some across any such anomalies in the Quran, i.e. where its expositions and explanations are in contrast to scientific findings?
A: The Scriptures of non-Muslims have been copied and passed on from generation to generation and through different personalities. The oldest document of this nature is "Jehovah", which was written some time during 9th Century A.D. This book, although not voluminous, is still the most comprehensive document of its kind. The second book (Sacrodotal), although generally treated as Preface to the Bible, came to light in 600 B.C. It deals with the creation of universe and the appearance of Man on earth and the stories narrating the events following it. The Bible comes thereafter, but the books of the "New Testament" do not throw much light on the problem of Man. They repeat the statements of the Old Testament as adopted by St. Luke. Quran made its appearance six hundred years after Jesus and furnished valuable material on Man and his creation which was (and still is) totally lacking in the Old as well as the New Testaments and other Scriptures. What is more important is this context is that unlike the Bible's Old and New Testaments, Quran is completely free from errors and interpolations.
Q: In your opinion, what are the main causes of such plentiful errors in other Scriptures?
A: The compilers of the Holy Scriptures, in their vanity, presumed to have compiled them on the basis of heavenly revelations. But all their efforts were the echoes of their period resounding the thoughts prevalent in that particular environment. They presented the conception of Man and the phenomenon of his creation as if enunciated by God Himself, though it merely reflected the traditions the rite and the perceptions well known and prevalent at that time. This fact is admitted unanimously by all the exegetes of the Bible, be they Roman Catholics or Protestants.
Q: Does the church also admit this fact and subscribe to this view?
A: Yes Sir. The church did accept this truth which was incorporated in the proceedings on the occasion of the second Vatican conference, which was held to declare the "Revolutionary Nature of Old and New Testaments". They admitted that some parts of these Bibles are defective and contradictory in purport.
Q: What are your views about the Quran in this behalf?
A: Now this is a matter of entirely a different nature. All scholars of the Quran are unanimous that the Quran is the "Word of God" as revealed to His Last Prophet Mohammed (S.A.W.) through Gabriel (The Angel of Revelation). I have studied the Book (Quran) very carefully and have not come across one single instance of scientific fallacy any where in it. On the contrary, I have felt that the (higher) truths and realities inherent in Quranic Text have been, throughout the history of 1400 years, beyond the comprehension of ordinary human beings which in itself, is positive proof that the Quran is the Word of God and it is (at places) beyond intellectual potential of mortal man; be he an excellent scholar or philosopher of the highest caliber, who is not always able to explain the inherent realities of nature as revealed in the Quran. What obviously conflicts with scientific truth is the assumption of the Bible that although life erupted in the form of various species, which have endured, there has been no evolution or improvement in their functions. On the other hand according to the Quran, Man has transgressed through gigantic changes in the course of the entire history of humanity. I felt it very necessary to inform the Christians of the world of this very serious discrepancy in the Bible. As it happen to be impartial, truthful and very outspoken in my studies, I have been repeatedly called upon from time to time to express my views regarding these matters before distinguished gatherings. On all such occasions, I have always dealt with the subject from the scientific point of view, ignoring the ecclesiastic or theological context. Whatever has appeared to be dubious or fit for further investigation, I have tried to put it on the touchstone of criticism and have not allowed to pass it unchallenged.
Q: Have you embraced Islam?
A: I wanted to make it quite clear in the very beginning that even before I learnt the first letter of Bismillah, I was convinced that God was unique and all- powerful and when God guided me to undertake a study of the Quran, my inner soul cried out that Al- Quran was the Word of God revealed to his Last Prophet Mohammed (S.A.W.).
In my book "Quran, Bible and Science," I have mentioned these facts and the book has met with instant success in the entire Christian world. In this book I have devoted myself to discuss all problems from purely academic angle, rather than that of faith or belief which would have revealed only my personal convictions. This was because I desired to be treated by the world as an academician rather than a theologian. About my faith and belief, God knows what is in one's heart. I am convinced that if I identify myself with any creed, people will invariably dub me as one belonging to such and such group and feel that whatever I say or do, I do so from only the angle of such and such creed group. I know my fellow beings very well and understand their mentality only too well. I wanted to assure them that all my pronouncements are based on scientific knowledge and not on any religious dogmas.
Q: This is O.K., but since you have referred to God's complete awareness with what is in one's heart, may we ask what is your opinion about human heart?
A: Heart is not an apparent and perceptible organ of the body. It is the abode of faith and source of eternal light.
Q: What are your views on Islamic mission and its future in the west?
A: The best method is to approach the people through in their own language. I am using the world language in its broadest sense, i.e. comprehensive of all the factors which go to make any language complete and expressive of peoples' views and beliefs. The principles and the regulations towards which you are inviting their attention, should be presented in the style with which you are familiar and which is popular among them. In my book "Quran Bible and Science", I have adopted a new style to acquaint the readers with Quranic truths and to understand the intrinsic value of al-Quran. This unprejudiced and impartial viewpoint of mine gave an impetus to the wide circulation in my books. Firstly, I tried to find out the central point of attention of the Christians and the style that appeals to their common sense. Thereafter I achieved this success. After the publication of these books I received a number of letters from great academicians and research scholars as well as commoners in which they expressed their interest in my study of Al-Quran and appreciated it. They felt satisfied with my views about the Bible and confirmed the fallacies pointed out by me. I once entertained some Christians at home, in which they expressed their astonishment over the literature I produced regarding Islam and inquired the names of exegesis to acquire correct information about it.
Q: What are your activities now?
A: We are now trying to produce a film on "Science, the Quran and the Origin of Man" as a matter of fact I have deep friendly relations with Malaysia. The provincial branch of "Dawa-Islamia" has passed a resolution to produce a film on the Quran and the director of the producing company visited Paris to prepare a plan for it. This film is to be in Technicolor. The duration of its presentation is fifty-five minutes being devoted to the Quran and the history of the facts related to it, the verses of the Quran are depicted in this film. Thus it is of great importance. Six hundred thousand dollars have been collected to produce this film. The preparation of this film has already been started. To begin with it will be produced in five languages, and then it will be extended up to ten. The first print will be in English, then Arabic and French, and thereafter in other languages. It will be circulated throughout the world.
The Islamic Bulletin
P.O. Box 410186, San Francisco, CA 94141-0186
info@islamicbulletin.org
Jumat, 17 September 2010
BIOLAN
Dampak dari pemakaian pupuk BIOLAN ini adalah kembalinya kesuburan tanah, tanah lebih gembur, mudah diolah, tidak keras, tanah dapat menyimpan cadangan air lebih banyak, sehingga, biala terjadi musim panas yang panjang, tanaman akan tetap bertahan.
Percobaan tehadap beberapa tanaman menunjukkan peningkatan produksi panen yang signifikan:
1. Padi bisa mencapai 20 ton per Ha.
2. Sawit bisa mencapai 40 ton per Ha.
3. Kentang bisa mencapai 30 ton per Ha.
4. Kedelai bisa mencapai 3 ton per Ha.
5. Jagung bisa mencapai 15 ton per Ha.
Selain produksi yang meningkat, pemakaian BIOLAN menstimulir percepatan produksi tanaman, seperti contohnya untuk kelapa sawit, usia produksi bisa dipercepat 1 sampai 1,5 tahun.
Hal-hal yang harus diperhatikan dalam pemakaian pupuk BIOLAN adalah bahwa sebelum menanam sesuatu di sebuah lahan, maka tanah di lahan tersebut harus diperksa dulu untuk mengetahui kandungan nutrisi dan mineralnya (unsur makro dan mikronya). Jenis tanaman juga harus diperiksa untuk mengetahui unsur makro dan mikro apa yang lebih dibutuhkan supaya tanaman itu tumbuh baik. Dengan demikian maka kita akan tahu dengan tepat pupuk organik dengan komposisi seperti apa yang dibutuhkan tanah dan tanaman itu. Kami akan membuat/produksi pupuk organik yang diperlukan khusus untuk itu.
Inilah salah satu cara kami untuk melakukan kontribusi dalam rangka penyelamatan lingkungan, pembalikan krisis sosial dan ekologis.
Rabu, 15 September 2010
Pembalikan Pengurusan Publik yg Berdampak Sosial Ekologis
Kesuburan dan kerusakan tanah yang parah saat ini adalah kontribusi pemakaian pupuk urea. Adanya perubahan iklim global, ada kontribusi dari Indonesia karena berkurangnya hutan tropis di Indonesia.
Industri Pulp/Kertas, terbukti banyak mengganggu ekosistem lokasi di mana bahan baku kertas/pulp itu ditemukan dan diexploitasi.
Pertambangan umum dan batubara, ekosistem bekas tambang sangat sulit dipulihkan dan memerlukan biaya yang sangat besar.
Ke depan, kebijakan exploitasi panas bumi akan mengakibatkan berkurangnya air tanah dalam.
Bila exploitasi sumber alam tidak dilakukan dengan bijak, maka biaya untum memperbaiki kerusakan (kerugian) adalah dua kali lipat dari nilai ekonomis yang diperoleh dr expolitasi sumber alam tersebut.
Oleh karena itu, marilah kita kritisi setiap kebijakan pemerintah dan RUU yang berkaitan dengan exploitasi sumber alam dan akan berpengaruh terhadap perubahan ekosistemnya.
Konflik (umat beragama) horizontal
Di Indonesia utk urusan agama ada dept agama, tapi mrk lebih tertarik utk ngurusin urusan2 agama yg ada duitnya, spt urusan haji, zakat, perkawinan dan sejenisnya. Utk urusan tempat ibadah/dakwah ada sk 2 menteri. Tapi sk itu tdk (bisa) dijalankan dgn seutuhnya. Pemerintah msh2 setengah2 ngurusin soal ini. Gak punya keberanian. Banci! Gw pernah bilang klo negara ini bukan negara sekuler dan bukan negara agama. Majority minority dlm urusan agama msh dianut, hal ini mengakibatkan pelaksanaan sk jd tdk konsisten. Para pejabat pemerintah msh takut sama yg majority. Hasilnya un fair treatment. Shg timbul konflik horizontal. Kita bisa berharap DPR angkat bicara. Tapi Elit politik klo urusan sensitif gini banyak yg angkat tangan, diam seribu bahasa. Pd hal mrk rakyat adalah konstituen parpol dan para elit politik juga. Gw bisa merasakan konflik ini spt api dlm sekam. Klo ada provokator yg canggih, bubar negara ini.
Al Qur'an (perlu) direvisi?
QS: Yunus:(37). Tidaklah mungkin Al Qur'an ini dibuat oleh selain Allah; akan tetapi (Al Qur'an itu) membenarkan kitab-kitab yang sebelumnya dan menjelaskan hukum-hukum yang telah ditetapkannya, tidak ada keraguan di dalamnya, (diturunkan) dari Tuhan semesta alam.
QS Al Hijr: (9). Sesungguhnya Kami-lah yang menurunkan Al Qur'an, dan sesungguhnya Kami benar-benar memeliharanya.
Oleh karenanya Nabi Muhammad SAW sangat dipelihara oleh Allah SWT sejak kelahirannya, supaya saat beliau diangkat sebagai Nabi dan Rasul Allah, tidak ada fitnah. Saat muda beliau dikenal sebagai Al Amin (yang dipercaya), pedagang yang jujur dan sukses dan tidak bisa baca tulis. Oleh karenanya daya ingat beliau sangat kuat. Al Qur'an yang 114 surat dan lebih dari 6200 ayat, dihafal oleh beliau diluar kepala, bukan hanya mengerti artinya, tetapi juga sangat mendalami tafsir dan hikmahnya. Setiap bulan Ramadhan, Allah memerintahkan Malaikat Jibril untuk mengecek hafalan Al Qur'an Nabi Muhammad SAW selama masa kerasulannya yang 23 tahun. Rasulullah memerintahkan para sahabatnya untuk juga ikut menghafal Al Qur'an (Hafidz) dan menuliskan Al Qur'an. Sehingga kesalahan atau kekeliruan dalam penulisan selalu ada control dari para Hafidz, sampai sekarang. Salah cetak pasti ketahuan, bila ada yang memalsu Al Qur'an, mudah ketahuan, apalagi merevisi. Hal spt itu tidak akan pernah terjadi. Di Indonesia, setiap tahun dicetak Hafidz2 baru, mereka dididik untuk menghafal Al Qur'an sejak usia dini, demikian juga dinegara-negara yang ada penduduk muslimnya, saya yakin selalu ada Hafidz. Inilah bukti janji Allah SWT dalam memelihara Al Qur'an.
Al Qur'an adalah sebuah kitab suci yang sempurna, jadi tidak perlu disempurnakan lagi. Silahkan periksa, bagian mana yang tidak sempurna, mari kita buktikan bersama-sama. Berikut saya petikan 3 ayat Al Qur'an sebagai referensi:
QS Al Baqarah :(23). Dan jika kamu (tetap) dalam keraguan tentang Al Qur'an yang Kami wahyukan kepada hamba Kami (Muhammad), buatlah satu surat (saja) yang semisal Al Qur'an itu dan ajaklah penolong-penolongmu selain Allah, jika kamu orang-orang yang benar.
QS Al Baqarah :(24). Maka jika kamu tidak dapat membuat (nya) dan pasti kamu tidak akan dapat membuat (nya), peliharalah dirimu dari neraka yang bahan bakarnya manusia dan batu, yang disediakan bagi orang-orang kafir.
QS Al Maidah: (3). .............Pada hari ini telah Kusempurnakan untuk kamu agamamu, dan telah Ku-cukupkan kepadamu nikmat-Ku, dan telah Ku-ridai Islam itu jadi agama bagimu..........................
Dalam berbagai kesempatan di dalam Al Qur'an, Allah SWT menantang para penentang-penentang Al Qur'an untuk membuat yang semisal Al Qur'an, kami yakin tidak akan ada yang pernah bisa. Di dalam ayat 3 Surat Al Maidah, Allah menegaskan bahwa saat itu (Haji Wada/Perpisahan Rasulullah SAW), melalui Rasulullah SAW menyampaikan ayat ini. Jadi menurut Allah SWT, agama (Islam) ini sudah sempurna, tidak perlu direvisi dan tidak perlu diperbaharui. Islam adalah rahmat bagi seluruh alam...ajaran Islam adalah ajaran yang sempurna dan abadi sampai akhir zaman.
Sampai sekarang, tidak ada kitab suci Al Qur'an yang ditulis atau dicetak berbeda antara satu dengan lainnya. Silahkan check dan bandingkan yang dicetak di Saudi, Iran, India, Lebanon, Mesir, Indonesia atau Malaysia. Semua sama, hanya gaya kaligrafinya saja berbeda. Isinya persis sama, kalau dibaca bunyinya persis sama (dibaca dengan gaya bahasa Arab Quraisy, bahasa asli Al Qur'an).
Kami muslimin dan muslimat, mukminin dan mukminat, sangat yakin, haqqul yakin, bahwa Al Qur'an yang sekarang saya baca adalah Al Qur'an yang asli yang diturunkan oleh Allah SWT kepada Nabi Besar Muhammad SAW. Bila ada orang yang meragukannya, saya menganggap orang itu tidak tahu atau belum tahu atau mengerti, bodoh/jahil, atau kufur.
Akan halnya Injil dan Taurat, saya tidak mengerti, saya tidak mempunyai pengetahuan tentangnya. Namun demikian, kami, orang2 muslimin dan muslimat, mukminin dan mukminat, diminta oleh Allah SWT untuk mempercayai kitab-kitab suci yang "pernah diturunkan" oleh Allah SWT kepada para Nabi dan RasulNya. Kami tidak mempunyai keraguan mengenai hal ini.
Saya mohon maaf jika ada yang kurang berkenan, yang benar datangnya dari Allah semata, yang salah dari saya, hamba Allah yang lemah....
Wallaahu 'alam bishshawwab.............................